RSO Architecture: Global Masterplans and Large-Scale Projects Transforming the World from Braga

Some architecture firms measure growth in square footage; others measure it in responsibility.

In 2025, RSO Architecture expanded in both directions—more projects, new geographies, and greater scale—but, above all, it grew in depth. The year was defined by refined methodologies, a maturing portfolio, and an increased capacity to deliver world-class consistency on a global scale. Operating from Braga with a strategic footprint bridging Portugal and the United States, RSO has consolidated a model it had long been refining: multicultural teams, complementary specializations, and a “flat” organizational culture where quality is not dictated by a single voice but driven by the collective.

When this collective clicks, the results materialize in the real world. A prime example is the recognition received at the PPP MENA Forum in Dubai, where the Al Ansar Hospital (Medina) was named “Social Infrastructure Deal of the Year – Middle East & Africa.” This accolade is a powerful symbol, validating success in a sector where meeting deadlines and maintaining quality is often a structural challenge.

Inside 2025: A Mature Portfolio and Higher Standards

“We finished the year strong. It was a very good year for us,” summarizes Sean Huang, CEO of RSO Architecture.

This statement reflects the reality of sustaining growth while navigating highly regulated sectors, multiple jurisdictions, tight deadlines, and distributed teams. This growth also possesses an ecosystem dimension: in its US projects, RSO Architecture has collaborated with major local companies in Braga, transporting the city’s talent to new geographies and proving that Braga exports not just ideas, but capability.

What changed in 2025 was not just volume, but typology and ambition. The focus shifted to healthcare, education, hospitality, and large-scale masterplans that demand urban design with less “zoning abstraction” and more “city.”

Nuno Rebelo, Director at RSO, highlights this shift: “We no longer limit ourselves to defining massing and footprints. We are defining how buildings relate to one another, how public space functions, and how architectural language gains a unique identity rather than repeating tired global solutions.”

Vanessa Coelho, Design Team Lead, describes the crucial operational evolution: “We have managed to respond more effectively, with higher quality and speed. Much of this is due to new technologies.” However, she notes, the key is not simply “working faster.” It is about freeing up mental space for investigation—arriving at solutions with purpose, rather than just “visuals.”

There is also a mark of maturity: RSO is now closing full cycles—from concept to technical construction packages—in projects where this continuity is often fractured. In practice, this builds institutional memory; what is learned in delivery becomes the standard for design.

The Al Ansar Case Study

Some projects are important for their design. Others are important because they prove an organization can execute.

The Al Ansar Hospital in Medina (244 beds, emergency services), designed for both residents and pilgrims under the Vision 2030 program, is set to become operational in 2026. What the team emphasizes—and this serves as a broader industry insight—is the rarity of seeing construction move “ahead of schedule” in an ecosystem where delays are the norm. The distinction received in Dubai validates the model: social infrastructure, public-private partnership (PPP), regional impact, and delivery capacity.

Aws Omran, utilizing his vast international experience, adds the cultural layer: “Cultural diversity has a direct impact on project quality; it brings a wider range of experiences and contexts to the table.” Meanwhile, Humberto Ferreira, a pillar of the team, points out the decisive reality: “Pressure and scale are only manageable with genuine mutual support.”

2026: The “Next Chapter”

When asked, “What projects do you want to attract?” most firms provide a list. At RSO, the answer is strategic. They aim to attract projects that consolidate two signature fronts:

1. Scale with Design: Masterplans and major operations where RSO enters not just to arrange volumes, but to define the city—flows, uses, public space, functional mix, and architectural identity.
2. High-Impact Specialization: Healthcare and education as fields where technical rigor, evidence-based design, and long-term vision are non-negotiable.

The firm is reinforcing precisely this: the ability to integrate the entire process, from conception to technical detail, using BIM (Building Information Modeling) and multidisciplinary coordination as a discipline, not a slogan.

Lin Jawich, BIM Specialist, explains why: “BIM isn’t software; it’s risk control. It is a fundamental tool to ensure precise and efficient project execution. Impacting international projects from Portugal is something that fascinates me every day.”

There is also a third, transversal axis: Technology and AI as tools for creative liberation, not shortcuts. Sean Huang puts it simply: “We use these tools to free us up so we have more time to think.”

What the World Can Teach the North: Planning, Contracting, Maintenance

When the conversation turns to specifics—“What international habits would you like to see more of in Braga and Northern Portugal?”—the most useful answer lies in financial sustainability: designing projects that are self-supporting and attractive to investment, rather than depending on “funding as a destination.”

There is a significant cultural difference between markets here. In the US, many projects start with hard, basic questions: Who pays? How is it maintained? How do we avoid the spiral of add-ons, patches, and hidden costs?

Nuno Rebelo cites hospitals as an example: they are not designed ‘for the moment’; they are designed to evolve with technology, medicine, patient flows, and future expansions. This logic of adaptability is currently one of the key drivers of value.

This connects directly to how projects are contracted and managed: greater clarity in criteria, more demanding briefing quality, evaluation based on performance and lifecycle (not just initial price), shared responsibility, and less “passing the buck” when things go wrong.

Sustainability: Environmental, Social, Financial… and Cultural

The word “sustainability” no longer convinces anyone on its own. It convinces only when transformed into a competitive advantage.

RSO’s vision serves as a model: Environmental sustainability as the baseline; Social sustainability as a condition for belonging; Financial sustainability as viability; and a Cultural layer—the ability to innovate without erasing the local context.

Experience in the Middle East demonstrates how culture is treated as ‘infrastructure’: projects featuring native vegetation, references to traditional construction methods, and spaces that declare identity. The challenge for Braga is evident: in a city that wants to be a destination (not just a thoroughfare), culture cannot be decoration—it must be strategy.

Here, tridimensional sustainability becomes economics: attracting talent isn’t just about paying better; it’s about offering a city. RSO addresses this in international masterplans because many clients, including large healthcare institutions, now face a ‘talent problem’: they can hire, but they can’t retain, because the urban context—schools, commerce, culture, life—is missing. In these cases, architecture stops being a ‘building’ and becomes an ‘ecosystem’.

Social Sustainability: Designing opportunities, not just buildings. Social impact in architecture is rarely made of grand speeches. It is made of small, cumulative decisions: safe access, mixed uses, active frontages, shade and thermal comfort in public spaces, amenities within a 15-minute walk, mobility, mixed-income housing, and spaces that create encounters rather than just circulation. When Sean mentions the mission is “making a difference,” he means the team accepts responsibility in masterplanning: “We are influencing the life of a community for years.”

Financial Sustainability: Lifecycle as a value driver. Northern Portugal has a massive opportunity, but it requires discipline: thinking in lifecycles means swapping ‘cheap’ for ‘predictable.’ In hospitals and schools, this is critical. Material choices, systems, spatial flexibility, expansion capacity, maintenance ease, energy efficiency, and operational digitization all reduce future costs and increase asset value. This is where BIM and project data cease to be ‘sophistication’ and become investment protection.

The ‘City Model’ Markets Are Demanding

“Clients are asking for talent—access to talent,” Sean warns. This connects Braga to a global theme: mid-sized cities with technological capacity can become hubs of intellectual production if they know how to create urban conditions.

If Braga wants to bet on the future, the bet isn’t on ‘a sector.’ It’s on an urban formula: quality housing, efficient mobility, social infrastructure (education and health), vibrant public space, and enduring culture. The rest—companies, investment, qualified tourism—tends to follow.

What Portugal Needs to Learn About “Ordering” Architecture

International experience points to clear changes needed in both public and private sectors: better briefings, tenders with criteria that value lifecycle and maintenance, realistic schedules, transparent decisions, and a model where risk and reward are managed maturely—especially in PPPs. When this is absent, the result is familiar: mistrust between politics and business, defensive bureaucracy, stalled projects, and sacrificed quality.

It is essential to avoid the vanity of architecture as an object or showpiece. Instead, we must acquire maturity in the discussion between public and private sectors regarding the “why, how, and who” of city development.

Regional Ecosystem: Who Needs to Be at the Table?

The answer is almost inevitable: universities, the municipality, developers, the construction industry, technology, health, and mobility sectors. But the essential factor is the role of each.

• The Municipality: Must create clear, predictable rules and possess decision-making capacity.
• The University: Must connect talent to real problems, not just closed research.
• The Industry: Must bring constructive innovation and productivity.
• Developers: Must accept the long term as part of the game.
• Technology: (Where Braga is strong) must enter not just as an ‘app’, but as infrastructure—data, simulation, digital twins, asset management.

This is why the logic of well-designed PPPs is appearing as a global trend: because many urban challenges are simply too big for a single actor.

A Concrete Agenda for 2026

If 2026 has a keyword, it might be Activation.

Activate projects that combine social infrastructure (schools and health), quality urban rehabilitation, and public spaces that anchor life—with environmental, social, and financial sustainability as baseline criteria, not a final chapter.

And activate a forum: a place where urban ideas can be presented, discussed with private and public sectors, and transformed into a real pipeline. RSO expresses this with the frustration of those who see potential: there are clear needs in the region—families, youth, leisure, destination qualification—but there is a lack of a decision-making and investment mechanism to match.

Ultimately, RSO’s takeaway from 2025 isn’t just that “it went well.” It is more serious: the firm is building a way of working that, if brought to Braga as a culture rather than an import, could elevate the entire region. Because it doesn’t limit itself to designing objects; it designs living conditions.

United States

Address: 2414 171st Avenue SE, Bellevue, WA 98008, USA

Email: usa@rso-architecture.com

Tel: +1 (424) 291-0073

Portugal

Address: Avenida da Liberdade, N.747 – 2º Andar
4710-249 Braga, Portugal
Email: europe@rso-architecture.com
Tel: +351 963036339Contacto:
Instagram: @rsoarchitecture

www.rso-architecture.com